↓ Skip to main content

Crack velocities in natural rubber

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, October 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Crack velocities in natural rubber
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, October 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00644675
Authors

A. N. Gent, P. Marteny

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 38%
Materials Science 6 29%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,181
of 8,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.