↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for HIV Acquisition in High Risk Women in a Generalised Epidemic Setting

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Risk Factors for HIV Acquisition in High Risk Women in a Generalised Epidemic Setting
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10461-015-1002-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nivashnee Naicker, Ayesha B. M. Kharsany, Lise Werner, Francois van Loggerenberg, Koleka Mlisana, Nigel Garrett, Salim S. Abdool Karim

Abstract

In South Africa young women bear a disproportionate burden of HIV infection however, risk factors for HIV acquisition are not fully understood in this setting. In a cohort of 245 women, we used proportional hazard regression analysis to examine the association of demographic, clinical and behavioural characteristics with HIV acquisition. The overall HIV incidence rate (IR) was 7.20 per 100 women years (wy), 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.50-9.80. Women 18-24 years had the highest HIV incidence (IR 13.20 per 100 wy, 95 % CI 6.59-23.62) and were almost three times more likely to acquire HIV compared to women 25 years and older [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 2.61, 95 % CI 1.05-6.47]. Similarly, women in relationships with multiple sex partners had more than twice the risk of acquiring HIV when compared to women who had no partner or who had a husband or stable partner (aHR 2.47, 95 % CI 0.98-6.26). HIV prevention programmes must address young women's vulnerability and sex partner reduction in this setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,081,606
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,924
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,197
of 358,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.