You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0193337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah McKenna, Eunro Lee, Kathleen A. Klik, Andrew Markus, Miles Hewstone, Katherine J. Reynolds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Andorra | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 96% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 25% |
| Psychology | 18 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#934,630
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,126
of 224,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,678
of 345,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#259
of 3,523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.