| Title |
A Taxonomy of Pairing-Friendly Elliptic Curves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cryptology, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00145-009-9048-z |
| Authors |
David Freeman, Michael Scott, Edlyn Teske |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 61 | 58% |
| Mathematics | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,285,815
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#19
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,715
of 110,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them