You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sietse Wieringa, Dunja Dreesens, Frode Forland, Carel Hulshof, Sue Lukersmith, Fergus Macbeth, Beth Shaw, Arlène van Vliet, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, Stephanie Chang, Pwee Keng Ho, Sonja Kersten, Miranda Langedam, Peter O’neill, Sarah Richards, Rodrigo Pardo Turriago, Sue Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 26% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,888,803
of 25,362,919 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#226
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,312
of 342,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.