↓ Skip to main content

Effective Elastic Properties of Fractured Rocks: Dynamic vs. Static Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Fracture, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 165)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Effective Elastic Properties of Fractured Rocks: Dynamic vs. Static Considerations
Published in
International Journal of Fracture, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10704-006-0105-4
Authors

Erik H. Saenger, Oliver S. Krüger, Serge A. Shapiro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Researcher 7 25%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 39%
Engineering 8 29%
Psychology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Fracture
#26
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,804
of 65,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Fracture
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.