| Title |
Antibody Array-Generated Cytokine Profiles of Tears of Patients with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis or Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10384-005-0319-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Shoji, Noriko Inada, Mitsuru Sawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#70
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,312
of 66,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them