↓ Skip to main content

Human Mitochondrial Transmembrane Metabolite Carriers: Tissue Distribution and Its Implication for Mitochondrial Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Human Mitochondrial Transmembrane Metabolite Carriers: Tissue Distribution and Its Implication for Mitochondrial Disorders
Published in
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, June 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1020501021222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjan Huizing, Wim Ruitenbeek, Lambert P. van den Heuvel, Vincenza Dolce, Vito Iacobazzi, Jan A. M. Smeitink, Ferdinando Palmieri, J. M. Frans Trijbels

Abstract

Mitochondrial transmembrane carrier deficiencies are a recently discovered group of disorders, belonging to the so-called mitochondriocytopathies. We examined the human tissue distribution of carriers which are involved in the process of oxidative phosphorylation (adenine nucleotide translocator, phosphate carrier, and voltage-dependent anion channel) and some mitochondrial substrate carriers (2-oxoglutarate carrier, carnitine-acylcarnitine carrier, and citrate carrier). The tissue distribution on mRNA level of mitochondrial transport proteins appears to be roughly in correlation with the dependence of these tissues on mitochondrial energy production capacity. In general the main mRNA expression of carriers involved in mitochondrial energy metabolism occurs in skeletal muscle and heart. Expression in liver and pancreas differs between carriers. Expression in brain, placenta, lung, and kidney is lower than in the other tissues. Western and Northern blotting experiments show a comparable HVDAC1 protein and mRNA distribution for the tested tissues. Patient's studies showed that cultured skin fibroblasts may not be a reliable alternative for skeletal muscle in screening for human mitochondrial carrier defects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 31%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#115
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,603
of 33,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them