↓ Skip to main content

Whole-Exome Re-Sequencing in a Family Quartet Identifies POP1 Mutations As the Cause of a Novel Skeletal Dysplasia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole-Exome Re-Sequencing in a Family Quartet Identifies POP1 Mutations As the Cause of a Novel Skeletal Dysplasia
Published in
PLoS Genetics, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evgeny A. Glazov, Andreas Zankl, Marina Donskoi, Tony J. Kenna, Gethin P. Thomas, Graeme R. Clark, Emma L. Duncan, Matthew A. Brown

Abstract

Recent advances in DNA sequencing have enabled mapping of genes for monogenic traits in families with small pedigrees and even in unrelated cases. We report the identification of disease-causing mutations in a rare, severe, skeletal dysplasia, studying a family of two healthy unrelated parents and two affected children using whole-exome sequencing. The two affected daughters have clinical and radiographic features suggestive of anauxetic dysplasia (OMIM 607095), a rare form of dwarfism caused by mutations of RMRP. However, mutations of RMRP were excluded in this family by direct sequencing. Our studies identified two novel compound heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in POP1, which encodes a core component of the RNase mitochondrial RNA processing (RNase MRP) complex that directly interacts with the RMRP RNA domains that are affected in anauxetic dysplasia. We demonstrate that these mutations impair the integrity and activity of this complex and that they impair cell proliferation, providing likely molecular and cellular mechanisms by which POP1 mutations cause this severe skeletal dysplasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
United Kingdom 2 2%
China 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 92 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 34%
Researcher 27 25%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Computer Science 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 6 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#3,759
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,870
of 124,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#29
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.