↓ Skip to main content

PCA and Clustering Reveal Alternate mtDNA Phylogeny of N and M Clades

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
PCA and Clustering Reveal Alternate mtDNA Phylogeny of N and M Clades
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00239-008-9148-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Alexe, R. Vijaya Satya, M. Seiler, D. Platt, T. Bhanot, S. Hui, M. Tanaka, A. J. Levine, G. Bhanot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#456
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,356
of 90,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.