| Title |
Preparation and evaluation of spore-specific affinity-augmented bio-imprinted beads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-006-0622-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott D. Harvey, Gary M. Mong, Richard M. Ozanich, Jeffrey S. Mclean, Shannon M. Goodwin, Nancy B. Valentine, Jim K. Fredrickson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 9 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 23% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#885
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,812
of 90,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.