↓ Skip to main content

The evaluation of “outcomes” of accounting ethics education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The evaluation of “outcomes” of accounting ethics education
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00383611
Authors

Stephen E. Loeb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 20 45%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Computer Science 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,180
of 2,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,968
of 59,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them