↓ Skip to main content

Modeling of ammonothermal growth processes of GaN crystal in large-size pressure systems

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Chemical Intermediates, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Modeling of ammonothermal growth processes of GaN crystal in large-size pressure systems
Published in
Research on Chemical Intermediates, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11164-011-0276-0
Authors

Qi-Sheng Chen, Yan-Ni Jiang, Jun-Yi Yan, Wei Li, V. Prasad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 32%
Engineering 3 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Research on Chemical Intermediates
#51
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,151
of 185,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Chemical Intermediates
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.