Title |
Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10856-010-4148-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Uwe Klammert, Elke Vorndran, Tobias Reuther, Frank A. Müller, Katharina Zorn, Uwe Gbureck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
Researcher | 20 | 19% |
Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 29 | 28% |
Materials Science | 17 | 17% |
Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,032
of 94,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.