↓ Skip to main content

Australia’s protected area network fails to adequately protect the world’s most threatened marine fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australia’s protected area network fails to adequately protect the world’s most threatened marine fishes
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.01.007
Authors

Karen R. Devitt, Vanessa M. Adams, Peter M. Kyne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Jersey 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Other 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 43%
Environmental Science 20 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,547,766
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#419
of 1,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,628
of 364,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#26
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.