↓ Skip to main content

Changes in trauma admission rates and mechanisms during recession and recovery: evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Changes in trauma admission rates and mechanisms during recession and recovery: evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00038-018-1087-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Coughlin, R. David Hayward, Mary Fessler, Elango Edhayan

Abstract

Although individual socioeconomic status has been linked with risk of traumatic injury, there has been relatively little research into the question of how economic changes may impact trauma admission rates in neighborhoods with different socioeconomic backgrounds. This study pairs ZIP code-level data on trauma admissions with county-level data on unemployment to assess differences in the type of changes experienced in more and less affluent neighborhoods of the Detroit metropolitan area between 2006 and 2014. Conditional linear growth curve modeling results indicate that trauma admission rates decreased during the "great recession" of 2008-2010 in neighborhoods with the highest unemployment levels, but increased during the same period of time in neighborhoods with lower unemployment. Consequently, citywide disparities in trauma incidence decreased during the recession and widened again as the economy began to improve. Trauma risks and demand for trauma care may shift geographically in relation to broader economic changes. Health care policy and planning should consider these dynamics when anticipating changing demands and needs for efforts at prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#1,539
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,578
of 351,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.