↓ Skip to main content

Single-layer centrifugation with Androcoll-E can be scaled up to allow large volumes of stallion ejaculate to be processed easily

Overview of attention for article published in Theriogenology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-layer centrifugation with Androcoll-E can be scaled up to allow large volumes of stallion ejaculate to be processed easily
Published in
Theriogenology, July 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.05.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.M. Morrell, A. Johannisson, A.-M. Dalin, H. Rodriguez-Martinez

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to optimize the volumes of Androcoll-E and sperm sample used in various sizes of centrifuge tube to scale up single-layer centrifugation (SLC) for routine use in the field. Although sperm suspensions of equivalent quality were produced using Androcoll-E in small and large tubes, the sperm yield was much lower in the latter (P<0.001). In contrast, in 200-mL tubes (XL), the yields were approximately 25% higher than those for the small tubes. An increased volume (4.5 mL) of extended ejaculate in small tubes (SLC-Inc) or 15 to 18 mL extended ejaculate on 15 mL of colloid of a reduced density, Androcoll-E-Large (SLC-Large), in 50-mL tubes were both found to give similar yields of motile spermatozoa as that of the SLC-Small method (SLC-Small, 49.7+/-18.6%; SLC-Inc, 53.3+/-17.1%; SLC-Large, 44.9+/-18.3%) and were found to be equivalent in quality (motility: 88.0+/-8.8%, 84.0+/-3.5%, 90.0+/-5.4%; normal morphology: 69.4+/-17.0%, 69.4+/-12.7%, 63.9+/-15.6%; viability: 78+/-16.7%, 83.8+/-12.5%, 80.05+/-14.6%; DNA fragmentation index: 14.7+/-10.9%, 12.8+/-8.1%, 11.6+/-7.6%, respectively). The processing of an "average" stallion Equus caballus ejaculate in approximately twenty-seven 10-mL tubes (SLC-Inc) or eight 50-mL tubes (SLC-Large) is feasible, the latter being considered more practical for on-stud use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 6 21%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Materials Science 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Theriogenology
#232
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,926
of 122,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theriogenology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.