| Title |
Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite with interconnected pore architecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-007-3036-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Gang Zhang, Qingshan Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 9 | 35% |
| Engineering | 6 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,457
of 72,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.