↓ Skip to main content

Adhesion of human T cells to antigen-presenting cells through SIRPβ2-CD47 interaction costimulates T-cell proliferation

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adhesion of human T cells to antigen-presenting cells through SIRPβ2-CD47 interaction costimulates T-cell proliferation
Published in
Blood, September 2004
DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Piccio, William Vermi, Kent S. Boles, Anja Fuchs, Carey A. Strader, Fabio Facchetti, Marina Cella, Marco Colonna

Abstract

Signal-regulatory proteins (SIRPs) are transmembrane glycoproteins belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily that are expressed in the immune and central nervous systems. SIRPalpha binds CD47 and inhibits the function of macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes, whereas SIRPbeta1 is an orphan receptor that activates the same cell types. A recently identified third member of the SIRP family, SIRPbeta2, is as yet uncharacterized in terms of expression, specificity, and function. Here, we show that SIRPbeta2 is expressed on T cells and activated natural killer (NK) cells and, like SIRPalpha, binds CD47, mediating cell-cell adhesion. Consequently, engagement of SIRPbeta2 on T cells by CD47 on antigen-presenting cells results in enhanced antigen-specific T-cell proliferation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 28%
Researcher 20 23%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#4,890
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,830
of 73,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#25
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.