| Title |
Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double‐bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-010-1128-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takanori Iriuchishima, Sheila J. M. Ingham, Goro Tajima, Takashi Horaguchi, Akiyoshi Saito, Yasuaki Tokuhashi, Albert H. Van Houten, Maarten M. Aerts, Freddie H. Fu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 58% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,020
of 2,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,903
of 95,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.