Title |
Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: influence of femoral tunnel orientation in knee laxity analysed with a navigation system – an in-vitro biomechanical study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-9-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefano Zaffagnini, Danilo Bruni, Sandra Martelli, Naoaki Imakiire, Maurilio Marcacci, Alessandro Russo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 49% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,545
of 4,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,593
of 79,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.