| Title |
Multipotent adult progenitor cell and stem cell plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1385/scr:1:1:053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balkrishna N. Jahagirdar, Catherine M. Verfaillie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#401
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,862
of 151,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.