↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Care in Rheumatoid Disease from the Clinician Perspective: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology and Therapy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Quality of Care in Rheumatoid Disease from the Clinician Perspective: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach
Published in
Rheumatology and Therapy, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40744-018-0107-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Finbar O’Shea, Peter C. Taylor, Gavin Dickie, Andrew Yaworsky, Benjamin Banderas, Sumesh Kachroo

Abstract

To establish clinical consensus on important and relevant quality-of-care (QoC) attributes in rheumatic disease (RD) treatment that may improve treatment outcomes and guide best practices. Twenty-three QoC attributes were identified in a literature review. Fifteen European-based clinicians were selected based on their contributions to RD guidelines, publications, and patient care. A three-round (an interview round and two web-based rounds) modified Delphi panel was conducted to reach consensus and finalize a QoC attribute list. In round 1 (clinician interviews), clinicians reported 52 unique QoC attributes across 14 themes, with the greatest number of attributes reported in the "treatment goals" (n = 7) and "remote monitoring" (n = 7) themes. During rounds 2 and 3, the critically important QoC attributes most frequently reported were access to care/treatment (n = 14, 93.3%), safety of treatment (round 2 n = 14, 93.3%, round 3 n = 13, 86.7%), and access to clinicians and specialists (round 2: n = 13, 86.7%, round 3: n = 14, 93.3%). The final list contained 53 QoC attributes. The study demonstrates consensus across several themes of QoC. Quality of care is a complex, multidimensional, and fluid concept that can be improved by ensuring patients have access to care, open communication between patients and clinicians, and the use of novel strategies, such as remote monitoring. Utilization of the attribute list can potentially improve the lives of patients, provide clinicians with tools to provide greater QoC, and improve the healthcare system as a whole. Merck & Co., Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,598,273
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology and Therapy
#337
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,656
of 329,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology and Therapy
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.