↓ Skip to main content

Experimental and numerical study of mechanism of glass modification process by continuous-wave laser backside irradiation (CW-LBI)

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Experimental and numerical study of mechanism of glass modification process by continuous-wave laser backside irradiation (CW-LBI)
Published in
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00339-012-7477-2
Authors

Sho Itoh, Hirofumi Hidai, Hitoshi Tokura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 2 25%
Engineering 2 25%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#422
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,345
of 286,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.