| Title |
A novel immunoassay system and bioseparation process based on thermal phase separating polymers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02798429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nobuo Monji, Allan S. Hoffman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 39% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,015,012
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#22
of 2,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235
of 11,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them