Title |
Managing Biomedical Image Metadata for Search and Retrieval of Similar Images
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10278-010-9328-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel Korenblum, Daniel Rubin, Sandy Napel, Cesar Rodriguez, Chris Beaulieu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 25 | 34% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,820,108
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#109
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,512
of 88,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.