↓ Skip to main content

Identification of missense, nonsense, and deletion mutations in the GRHPR gene in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type II (PH2)

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Identification of missense, nonsense, and deletion mutations in the GRHPR gene in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type II (PH2)
Published in
Human Genetics, August 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004390000351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie E. Webster, Patrick M. Ferree, Ross P. Holmes, Scott D. Cramer

Abstract

Primary hyperoxaluria type II (PH2) is a rare disease characterized by the absence of an enzyme with glyoxylate reductase, hydroxypyruvate reductase, and D-glycerate dehydrogenase activities. The gene encoding this enzyme (GRHPR) has been characterized, and a single mutation has been detected in four PH2 patients. In this report, we have identified five novel mutations. One nonsense mutation (C295T) results in a premature stop codon at codon 99. A 4-bp deletion mutation has been found in the 5' consensus splice site of intron D, resulting in a predicted splicing error. Three missense mutations have been detected, including a missense transversion (T965G) in exon 9 (Met322Arg), a missense transition (G494A) in the putative co-factor binding site in exon 6 (Gly165Asp), and a substitution of an adenosine for a guanine in the 3' splice site of intron G. The functional consequences of the missense transversion and transition mutations have been investigated by transfection of cDNA encoding the mutated protein into COS cells. Cells transfected with either mutant construct have no enzymatic activity, a finding that is not significantly different from the control (empty) vector (P<0.05). These results further confirm that mutations in the GRHPR gene form the genetic basis of PH2. Ten of the 11 patients that we have genotyped are homozygous for one of the six mutations identified to date. Because of this high proportion of homozygotes, we have used microsatellite markers in close linkage with the GRHPR gene to investigate the possibility that the patients are the offspring of related individuals. Our data suggest that two thirds of our patients are the offspring of either closely or distantly related persons. Furthermore, genotyping has revealed the possible presence of a founder effect for the two most common mutations and the location of the gene near the marker D9S1874.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Other 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2008.
All research outputs
#7,668,752
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#953
of 2,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,326
of 37,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.