↓ Skip to main content

Morphological and functional responses of a metal-tolerant sunflower mutant line to a copper-contaminated soil series

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Morphological and functional responses of a metal-tolerant sunflower mutant line to a copper-contaminated soil series
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-1837-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aliaksandr Kolbas, Natallia Kolbas, Lilian Marchand, Rolf Herzig, Michel Mench

Abstract

The potential use of a metal-tolerant sunflower mutant line for biomonitoring Cu phytoavailability, Cu-induced soil phytotoxicity, and Cu phytoextraction was assessed on a Cu-contaminated soil series (13-1020 mg Cu kg-1) obtained by fading a sandy topsoil from a wood preservation site with a similar uncontaminated soil. Morphological and functional plant responses as well as shoot, leaf, and root ionomes were measured after a 1-month pot experiment. Hypocotyl length, shoot and root dry weight (DW) yields, and leaf area gradually decreased as soil Cu exposure rose. Their dose-response curves (DRC) plotted against indicators of Cu exposure were generally well fitted by sigmoidal curves. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of morphological parameters ranged between 203 and 333 mg Cu kg-1soil, corresponding to 290-430 μg Cu L-1in the soil pore water, and 20 ± 5 mg Cu kg-1DW in the shoots. The EC10for shoot Cu concentration (13-15 mg Cu kg-1DW) coincided to 166 mg Cu kg-1soil. Total chlorophyll content and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were early biomarkers (EC10: 23 and 51 mg Cu kg-1soil). Their DRC displayed a biphasic response. Photosynthetic pigment contents, e.g., carotenoids, correlated with TAC. Ionome was changed in Cu-stressed roots, shoots, and leaves. Shoot Cu removal peaked roughly at 280 μg Cu L-1in the soil pore water.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Engineering 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5,443
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,246
of 332,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#109
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.