↓ Skip to main content

Performance of a modified MASCC index score for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Performance of a modified MASCC index score for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00520-007-0347-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano de Souza Viana, José Carlos Serufo, Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha, Renato Nogueira Costa, Roberto Carlos Duarte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,862
of 4,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,653
of 76,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.