| Title |
Oncogenes as Novel Targets for Cancer Therapy (Part I)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of PharmacoGenomics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00129785-200505030-00004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuo Zhang, Mao Li, Elizabeth R. Rayburn, Donald L. Hill, Ruiwen Zhang, Hui Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of PharmacoGenomics
#25
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,547
of 186,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of PharmacoGenomics
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.