| Title |
Registration and Analysis of Vascular Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, November 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026126900358 |
| Authors |
Stephen R. Aylward, Julien Jomier, Sue Weeks, Elizabeth Bullitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 28 | 50% |
| Engineering | 10 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#234
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,329
of 57,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.