| Title |
Natural antioxidants of plant origin against ozone damage of sensitive crops
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11738-010-0527-5 |
| Authors |
Nataliya P. Didyk, Oleg B. Blum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,760,740
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#16
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,899
of 96,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them