| Title |
Functional Consequences of Sarcomeric Protein Abnormalities in Failing Myocardium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart Failure Reviews, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10741-005-5254-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin M. LeWinter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 27% |
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#232
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,594
of 58,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.