↓ Skip to main content

The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11739-015-1203-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Fattirolli, Niccolò Marchionni, Stefan Höfer, Pantaleo Giannuzzi, Elisabetta Angelino, Paolo Fioretti, Daniela Miani, Neil Oldridge

Abstract

Patient-centered treatment outcomes such as health-related quality of life are recommended in clinical care and research studies. Health-related quality of life questionnaires need to be validated in the language of the target population. The reliability and validity of the Italian version of the MacNew Questionnaire was determined in patients with angina, myocardial infarction, or ischemic heart failure. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected on 298 patients [angina, n = 88; MI, n = 106; heart failure, n = 104; mean age, 64.8 (±10.6) years] at three centers in Italy. MacNew mean scores were higher (p < 0.001) in patients with myocardial infarction than in patients with either angina or heart failure with no floor and minimal ceiling effects. The three-factor structure of the original MacNew form was largely confirmed explaining 54.6 % of the total variance. The Italian MacNew version demonstrates high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.86), confirms the convergent validity hypotheses with strong correlations on six of eight comparisons (r ≥ 0.86), partially confirms discriminative validity with the SF-36 health transition item, and fully confirms discriminative validity with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The Italian version of the MacNew Questionnaire demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties, and is reliable and valid in Italian-speaking patients with angina, MI, or heart failure. Responsiveness could not be tested due to the cross-sectional design of the parent study, and needs to be investigated in an intervention study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Psychology 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%