↓ Skip to main content

Type I Interferon: Understanding Its Role in HIV Pathogenesis and Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Type I Interferon: Understanding Its Role in HIV Pathogenesis and Therapy
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11904-014-0244-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven E. Bosinger, Netanya S. Utay

Abstract

Despite over 30 years of research, the contribution of type I interferons (IFN-Is) to both the control of HIV replication and initiation of immunologic damage remains debated. In acute infection, IFN-Is, likely from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), activate NK cells and upregulate restriction factors targeting virtually the entire HIV life cycle. In chronic infection, IFN-Is may also contribute to CD4 T cell loss and immune exhaustion. pDCs subsequently infiltrate lymphoid and mucosal tissues, and their circulating populations wane in chronic infection; IFN-I may be produced by other cells. Data from nonhuman primates indicate prompt IFN-I signaling is critical in acute infection. Whereas some studies showed IFN-I administration without combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is beneficial, others suggest that stimulating or blocking IFN-I signaling in chronic ART-suppressed HIV infection has had positive results. Here, we describe the history of HIV and IFN-I, IFN-I's sources, IFN-I's effects on HIV control and host defense, and recent interventional studies in SIV and HIV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,307,363
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#71
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,597
of 364,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.