↓ Skip to main content

Searching for NIDDM susceptibility genes: studies of genes with triplet repeats expressed in skeletal muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Searching for NIDDM susceptibility genes: studies of genes with triplet repeats expressed in skeletal muscle
Published in
Diabetologia, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00418545
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Yamagata, J. Takeda, S. Menzel, X. Chen, S. Eng, L. R. Lim, P. Concannon, C. L. Hanis, R. S. Spielman, N. J. Cox, G. I. Bell

Abstract

The expansion of trinucleotide repeats has been associated with late-onset neurodegenerative disorders. Although the genes harbouring the triplet expansions may be widely expressed, the pathological expression of these diseases is restricted to specific tissues. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) shares several features with diseases resulting from such dynamic mutations including late-onset and specific but limited sites of tissue pathology-muscle, fat, liver and insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells. In order to examine the contribution of genes containing polymorphic CAG/CTG repeats to the development of NIDDM, we screened an adult human skeletal muscle cDNA library for expressed sequences containing tandem repeats of CAG and/ or CTG. Ten different loci with polymorphic CAG/ CTG repeats were identified, of which seven had a heterozygosity greater than 0.20. There was no evidence for linkage between these seven loci and NIDDM in a group of affected Mexican-American sib pairs. Nor was there a significant difference in the distribution of alleles between Caucasian patients with NIDDM and normal healthy control subjects or evidence for repeat expansion in diabetic subjects. Thus, muscle genes with polymorphic CAG/CTG repeats do not appear to play a significant role in the development of NIDDM.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,705,696
of 23,437,201 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,929
of 5,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,454
of 28,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,437,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.