| Title |
Mechanism of cellobiose inhibition in cellulose hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Life Sciences, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1360/02yc0163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yue Zhao, Bin Wu, Baixu Yan, Peiji Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 33% |
| Engineering | 13 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#404
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,571
of 143,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them