| Title |
Untersuchungen in den Dreistoffsystemen: Molybdän-Silizium-Bor, Wolfram-Silizium-Bor und in dem System: VSi2−TaSi2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, March 1957
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00901624 |
| Authors |
H. Nowotny, E. Dimakopoulou, H. Kudielka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 10 | 31% |
| Engineering | 5 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#96
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96
of 1,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them