↓ Skip to main content

Two Types of Phytases (Histidine Acid Phytase and β-Propeller Phytase) in Serratia sp. TN49 from the Gut of Batocera horsfieldi (Coleoptera) Larvae

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Two Types of Phytases (Histidine Acid Phytase and β-Propeller Phytase) in Serratia sp. TN49 from the Gut of Batocera horsfieldi (Coleoptera) Larvae
Published in
Current Microbiology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00284-011-9995-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Zhang, Peilong Yang, Huoqing Huang, Pengjun Shi, Tiezheng Yuan, Bin Yao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,317,125
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#87
of 2,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,211
of 124,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.