| Title |
‘Broken hospital windows’: debating the theory of spreading disorder and its application to healthcare organizations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3012-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Churruca, Louise A. Ellis, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 27% |
| Australia | 22 | 19% |
| United States | 8 | 7% |
| Denmark | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 50% |
| Scientists | 31 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#507,384
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#80
of 8,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,558
of 350,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.