| Title |
Development and Characterization of Microfluidic Devices and Systems for Magnetic Bead-Based Biochemical Detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011490627871 |
| Authors |
Jin-Woo Choi, Kwang W. Oh, Arum Han, C. Ajith Wijayawardhana, Chad Lannes, Shekhar Bhansali, Kevin T. Schlueter, William R. Heineman, H. Brian Halsall, Joseph H. Nevin, Arthur J. Helmicki, H. Thurman Henderson, Chong H. Ahn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 37% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#105
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,146
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.