You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and Validation of miRNAs as Endogenous Controls for RQ-PCR in Blood Specimens for Breast Cancer Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0083718 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ailbhe M. McDermott, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,498
of 196,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,487
of 305,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,222
of 5,444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.