| Title |
A method for measuring electrical signals in a primary cilium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cilia, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-2530-1-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy K Kleene, Steven J Kleene |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Cilia
#39
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,449
of 169,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cilia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.