| Title |
Generation of expressed sequence tags from a cDNA library of Coleus forskohlii for identification of genes involved in terpene biosynthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologia Plantarum, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10535-015-0526-x |
| Authors |
Y. Fang, J. Huang, X. Huang, S. H. Chen, P. C. Zou, W. S. Li, K. Yu, Y. W. Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biologia Plantarum
#14
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,284
of 278,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia Plantarum
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them