↓ Skip to main content

Stretch-induced cell damage in sarcoglycan-deficient myotubes

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Stretch-induced cell damage in sarcoglycan-deficient myotubes
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, May 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004240100516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurilio Sampaolesi, Tomokazu Yoshida, Yuko Iwata, Hironori Hanada, Munekazu Shigekawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Engineering 2 25%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#249
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,097
of 42,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them