↓ Skip to main content

Six transcripts map within 200 kilobases of the myotonic dystrophy expanded repeat

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Six transcripts map within 200 kilobases of the myotonic dystrophy expanded repeat
Published in
Mammalian Genome, June 1998
DOI 10.1007/s003359900804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madawi Alwazzan, Marion G. Hamshere, Greg G. Lennon, J. David Brook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,514,813
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#338
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,759
of 34,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.