| Title |
Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade trees for coffee, cacao and tea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agroforestry Systems, March 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00046410 |
| Authors |
John Beer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#142
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,439
of 11,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them