↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40262-018-0641-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sílvia M. Illamola, Catherine M. Sherwin, J. G. Coen van Hasselt

Abstract

Amikacin plays a key role in the treatment of severe hospital-acquired infections with Gram-negative bacteria. Therapeutic use of amikacin is challenged by high inter-individual variability (IIV) combined with a narrow therapeutic spectrum. Pediatric patients represent a particularly fragile population where adequate dosing is crucial yet challenging to achieve due significant IIV associated with developmental processes and other factors. The current review provides an overview of parametric population pharmacokinetic analyses of amikacin in pediatric patients and associated patient-specific determinants of IIV. We searched PubMed for parametric population pharmacokinetic analyses of amikacin in pediatric patients. Information on patient population, study design, pharmacokinetic model characteristics, and identified patient-specific predictors of IIV was collected. Comparative analyses across studies were conducted to characterize quantitative differences reported for different studies and patient populations. Eight eligible publications were identified, of which six analyses involved neonates up to 3 months of age and two studies investigated older pediatric patients (age 2-17 years). Most commonly included covariates were current body weight for both clearance and volume of distribution, followed by age-related covariates on clearance in neonatal studies (four of six models). Quantitative comparisons of different models reported generally showed similar developmental effects in neonatal populations. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of parametric population pharmacokinetic studies for amikacin. Future studies could address the knowledge gap of patients between 3 months and 2 years of age. Furthermore, systematic studies of additional potential predictors for IIV (e.g., sepsis, inflammatory markers, renal function biomarkers) could be of relevance to address the significant IIV remaining after inclusion of the most commonly identified covariates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Psychology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,159,558
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#242
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,367
of 331,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.