| Title |
M-mode sonography of diaphragmatic motion: description of technique and experience in 278 pediatric patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-005-1433-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mónica Epelman, Oscar M. Navarro, Alan Daneman, Stephen F. Miller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#652
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,749
of 70,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.