| Title |
An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-4-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary D Bader, Christopher WV Hogue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1414 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 314 | 21% |
| Researcher | 216 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 193 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 122 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 76 | 5% |
| Other | 231 | 15% |
| Unknown | 344 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 345 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 305 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 176 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 4% |
| Engineering | 35 | 2% |
| Other | 168 | 11% |
| Unknown | 411 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,943,802
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#854
of 7,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,842
of 139,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them